Mbml Live 4-tabling 200 - 500 NL Zoom

  • NL СГС
  • NL СГС
  • $200 - $500
  • Къси маси
(22 гласа) 11743

Присъедини се към нас сега, за да гледаш цялото видео

Безплатно членство

Присъедини се


Galvin "mbml" Bay returns to PokerStrategy.com after his Supernova Elite run in 2013 with a live session at 200 - 500 NL Zoom on PokerStars


Live Video PokerStars Zoom

Коментари (15)

първо най-новите
  • cybstr


    nice vid, hope u will do some more zoom live play
  • zlatan88ibra


    very nice vid !

    KQo 4bet CO vs BTN: Why do you preffer 4bet than CC in this situations ?

    89ss: Why fold min4bet with these odds ? 6$ for a pot of 35$ (pot odds 17%) 89s hit a nut hand 11%(including FD+pair, FD+OE,FD+GS) and hit good draws 17%. His range is too strong but with the implicities imo is a good call pre

    99: Thin value river ! Is close no?

    Sorry for my english. see you at the tables
  • Campernator


    I like some of your thoughts but i think that the webcam is rather disturbing; its hides a few HUDs and doesnt help the video in any way?!
  • Campernator


    *it hides
  • Talent2


    Hey mbml,

    I enjoyed watching your video! :)
    Hope you keep it up!
    Min 05:39 AQo: Imo this has to be bluff with your AQo otr. This is one of your weakest holdings on this texture and you obv have some value combos (JJ/TT/99/KQs/AA/AJs)so you wonna have a bluffing range aswell and i feel like AQo should be a mandatory bluff there, thoughts!?
    Min 05:58 A6o: Why do you choose such a large sizing vs a weaker player with your marginal holding on such a wet texture?
    Min 06:09 JTo: Mandatory flat there with JTo? I prolly prefer iso 3betting, thoughts!?
  • Talent2


    Min 19:18 86s/K4s: Why 3betting 86s sb vs bu?
    Same goes for K4s in Min 25:30. Don`t you use a linear range there?
    Min 19:32 99: Why do you bet your 99 on this dry texture soo big ott, given that you should have some floats in your range and they prolly don`t wonna use this big of a sizing if you think Ahigh will call you there!?
    Min 21:42 A3s: You snap the turn there, what do you think is his air range there and what is the worst hand you continue ott with ?(his bluffing range: sth like J7s-J9s/J9o/Q7s-Q9s/Q8o-Q9o/5c4c-9c8c !?)
    Min 24:14 AJo: Why did you choose to bet this texture so small otf?
    Min 34:41 J6o: Why did you choose such a big sizing on this texture?
    Min 36:21 Q9o: What hands do you expect him to bluff with his bet/check behind/bet line on this board, that you think c/c river is better than going for thin value, or c/f river?
    Min 38:35 77: I think this 77 call ott looks super standard but given what you said don`t you think he will bluff most of his hands like(QJ/KJ/KQ/weak Axs) otf and he prolly won`t turn strong Ax ott into a bluff so his turn betting range is mainly value (J9s/Q9s/K9s/A9/88/JTs), what are your thoughts on that!?

    Loved the phonecall :D
    Take care!
  • gonepoker


    Talent2 asked pretty much everything whats possible so just waiting for reply :D
    Talent2, what's your bluff sizing? (Min 05:39 AQo)

    Min 41:02 is it standard to go under the table when getting a phone call? :D
  • Talent2


    # My value range of: AA/KQs/JJ/TT/99 obv can bet big so i probably like everything from 90%-150% pot :)
    Especially if you know villain a little better (3bet-range/checking back range otf) and you agree about the fact that most regs are capt in his spot.
  • Talent2


    My value range of: AA/AJs/KQs/JJ/TT/99 obv can bet very big, so i probably like everything from 90%-150% pot.
    Especially if you know villain a little better (3bet range/checking back game plan), cause most regs tend to be very capt in his spot (JJ/QQ/KK/AA/ATo/KTo/QTo/JTo/K9s/Q9s maybe sth like this!? and they rarly show up with sth like AJo/KJo/QJo/J8s)
  • mbml


    2: I call in both situations against wider ranges but the opponents in the video were on the tighter side.
  • Talent2


  • mbml


    was away on a holiday, now I'm back

    AQ: I don't think it's a mandatory bluff, parts of his range improve like KQ/QJ/KJ. He's also on the tighter side which reduces the number of SCs he has (like 98s/76s) which would fold to a river bet, and weights his range more towards the broadways

    A6: I want more FE to fold out his weaker hands. This guy is a weak/tight type of player and if i bet small he probably calls a lot more often

    JT: that's certainly an option. I prefer it doing with slightly stronger hands, and the regs behind me aren't that aggro anyway.
  • mbml


    Light 3bets: Exploitive play vs guys who fold too much

    99: Ace high calls twice really often vs that size, so does any other pair. And 99=AA IMO.

    A3s: In 2014 it's almost always a mistake to fold top pair for 2 bets and I didn't have any good reason to fold top pair. Probably AX? You could argue that KQ > A3 due to gutshot equity but at the same time AX contains blockers to top pair.

    AJo: calling range of villain doesnt change too much if I bet large or small

    J6o: Bet larger on flops which are easier to float on (villain's calling range is more price-elastic)
  • mbml


    Q9o: I don't have to put him on any specific bluff hand. I just think that this is the max EV line at the point in time.

    I don't think he bets Flop and calls River with too many worse hands so leading River didn't feel like a good option. At the same time I think he has enough bet check bet bluffs so I called.

    77: Well there are some dynamics between us, won't go into too much detail about that but anyway I'm sure he checks some real stuff on the Flop sometimes.
  • LorD231984


    I think 89s should be an easy call due to potodds... Only shorter stack can be a con...